I recommend major revision
Webmajor revision的回复模板 先给大家详细介绍一下SCI论文投稿后可能的六种结果以及它们的应对方案。 1. Desk reject（直接拒稿） ：主编直接拒稿，文章不会进入审稿环节。 对于 … WebRecommended reviewers must have sufficient expertise in the relevant subject area. Authors should not recommend reviewers with whom they have a conflict of interest, for example, a close collaborator or colleague. ... Major revision. The manuscript could be suitable for publication after the author(s) have responded to the reviewer comments and ...
I recommend major revision
Did you know?
WebMajor revisions are almost always sent back to reviewers for a re-review to determine whether the comments have been addressed and no new comments are raised. If authors are unable to satisfactorily address the comments, further revisions may be required or the paper may be rejected. WebMajor Revision: The principle of the article is sound and it has a chance of being accepted but requires substantial change to be made. This may include further experiments or analysis, the inclusion of additional literature or theory, …
WebMajor revision Your article has a chance of being accepted, but the reviewers have requested substantial changes to be made. These changes are expected to take … WebOct 1, 2012 · To my experience, major revision in general leads to the acceptance of a manuscript reviewed and re-reviewed for several rounds. Minor revision may undergo referee evaluation; however, in most cases, the editor accepts the paper without sending …
WebMajor Revision: The principle of the article is sound and it has a chance of being accepted but requires substantial change to be made. This may include further experiments or … Weblevel 1. · 1 yr. ago. I agree, minor revisions are entirely writing errors, while major revisions requires data reinterpretation. However, my supervisor told me several times when submitting papers that there's no such thing as minor revisions anymore and everyone seems to always say major just because they can. 2 of my papers came back as ...
WebJan 9, 2024 · The major results may not be identified from the presented figures and tables. Graphs may be presented with axes labled with print too small to be read. The Discussion …
WebOct 9, 2024 · According to the grid, one should only recommend rejection if there are major or critical technical issues, regardless of whether spelling, grammar, and structure are … flagpole xmas lightsWebJan 8, 2014 · – The two reviewers are happy with your modifications, and they will recommend to accept the paper. The decision will be “accept”. – One or both of the reviewers still have some issues with the paper. In this case they will ask for another revision. The decision will be “minor revision” or “major revision”. canon eos m200 reviewsWebClearly show the major revisions in the text, either with a different color text, by highlighting the changes, or with Microsoft Word’s Track Changes feature. This is in addition to describing the changes in your point by point cover letter. Return the revised manuscript and response letter within the time period allotted by the editor. canon eos m200 live streamingWebDecision Types. Accept - No further revision required. The manuscript is publishable in its current form. The majority of articles require revision before reaching this stage. Minor Revision - A limited number of changes are required. Implies that the editors and reviewers feel the paper is publishable once their comments have been addressed. flagpole wobblingWebI recommend you try the meatballs. I will be recommending the meatballs tonight. Both of these examples are correct. However, “I recommend” here means we’re recommending … flag policy armyWeb1. The work lacks scientific merit - the manuscript does not make any significant improvement to the intended field of research. 2. Personal biases are elevated above … canon eos m200 review ukWebNoun (lb) The act of instructing, teaching, or furnishing with information or knowledge.*{{quote-book, year=1927, author= F. E. Penny, chapter=5, title= Pulling the … flag pole with light